Skip to content
NeuralYug

Work · Fintech · Singapore

Document & reconciliation automation that saved a day a week

We built a document-and-reconciliation pipeline that removed a recurring weekly bottleneck.

case study10 Jun 2026
12
Hours saved weekly
99%
Match accuracy
2×
Faster close

The pipeline we shipped

4 stages

Stage 01 · Extract

A document-AI layer pulled the fields out of each document as it landed.

The challenge

Finance staff spent the better part of a day each week manually matching documents and reconciling figures.

What we did

We built an extraction-and-matching pipeline with confidence scoring and human review for the edge cases that genuinely need it.

The outcome

The weekly bottleneck became a brief review, accuracy improved, and the close cycle sped up across the board.

Stack

Document AIAutomation pipelinesPythonGCP

For this team, reconciliation was a standing weekly appointment nobody enjoyed: documents in every format, figures matched by hand, the better part of a day gone before the close could even start. The build did not try to remove the humans. It removed the re-keying, and left the judgement calls where they belong. Follow one document through the pipeline below.

The document-and-reconciliation pipeline

Follow one document from inbox to a closed book. Tap a stage to see what happens.

Fintech · Singapore

AI reads each document

Documents arrive in every format. An extraction model pulls the fields that matter (amount, date, party, reference) from each one, replacing the manual reading that used to swallow the better part of a day each week.

AI does the routine workA person owns judgement
The document-and-reconciliation pipeline: extract, match, score, close. Tap a stage to see what happens there.

Confidence scoring is the trick

The reason automation can hit 99% match accuracy without a person checking everything is confidence scoring. Every field the model reads and every match it proposes carries a score. High-confidence matches pass straight through; only the genuinely uncertain items surface for review. That is how the hours come back without accuracy slipping, because people spend their time only where their judgement actually adds something.

How the pipeline is built

Documents are read by a document-AI and OCR layer, a Python matching service pairs each one with the right payment and ledger entry, confidence scoring routes the edge cases to a reviewer, and matched records post with a full audit trail, all running on GCP. The corrections a reviewer makes feed back into the model, so it gets steadily better at the messy cases. The weekly bottleneck became a brief review, the close ran twice as fast, and the finance team got its time back.

Time reclaimed on reconciliation

This build gave a finance team back 12 hours a week. Set your own weekly hours to estimate the gap for your team.

12hrs / week
saved (delivered)
99%match
accuracy
faster
close

You could reclaim

12 hrs

per week

552 hrs / year

The 12 hours a week saved, 99% match accuracy and 2× faster close are results delivered on this engagement. The estimate above is illustrative and depends on your own volume and data quality.

Time reclaimed on reconciliation. The 12 hours a week is the delivered result; set your own hours to estimate the gap. Illustrative, not a promise.

At a glance

Client

Fintech team

Sector

Fintech · Singapore

Service

Flow Automation

Kind

case study

Headline result

12 · Hours saved weekly

Handover

Documented, tested code in your repository

Questions we were asked

How did this save 12 hours a week?

The old process meant a person reading documents and matching figures by hand for the better part of a day each week. The pipeline reads each document, matches records automatically, and only surfaces the genuine edge cases, so the weekly grind became a short review and the team got roughly 12 hours a week back.

How is 99% match accuracy possible with automation?

Because the system does not guess. Every extracted field and every match carries a confidence score, clean high-confidence matches pass straight through, and anything uncertain is routed to a person to confirm or correct. Those corrections feed back so the model keeps improving.

Does automating reconciliation remove the finance team's control?

No. The pipeline handles the repetitive matching so people stop re-keying, but a person still owns judgement and reviews the edge cases the system flags. The result is a faster close with a full audit trail, not a black box.

Same problem, different business?

We'll send the architecture and a realistic timeline for your version of this — no obligation.

Request a blueprint